--This is a Guest Post written by Lon Weaver, Marshall School Chaplain and Religion and Ethics Teacher--
When that occurs, a great little article my father passed along to me decades ago comes to mind. Dad worked in quality control/quality assurance for 25 years. Thus, it was logical that this article would catch his eye:
In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Some years after that, the Latin American liberation movement declared that a fundamental tenet of a sound spirituality must be a "preferential option for the poor," the most visibly vulnerable in Latin American context (Gustavo Gutierrez, The Power of the Poor in History [Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1983], pp. ix, x, 126, 37, 149).
Let's get real here. Is it truly necessary to go for "zero defects"? Why isn't 99.9% defect-free good enough? Those are questions often posed to quality consultant Jeff Dewar, of Red Bluff, Calif.-based QCI International, when he argues for eliminating defects altogether. To make his point, Dewar has come up with some examples of what life would be like if things were done right 99.9% of the time. We'd have to accept:
- 1 hour of unsafe drinking water every month;
- 2 unsafe plane landings per day at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago;
- 16,000 pieces of mail lost by the U.S. Postal Service every hour;
- 20,000 incorrect drug prescriptions per year;
- 500 incorrect surgical operations each week;
- 50 newborn babies dropped at birth by doctors every day;
- 22,000 checks deducted from the wrong bank accounts each hour; and
- 32,000 missed heartbeats per person per year.
Suddenly, the quest for zero defects makes a lot of sense…Of course, all of those are 1989 numbers.
Martin Luther King, Jr. Photo credit: Mike Licht, NotionsCapital.com via Foter.com / CC BY |
If we apply these thoughts to academic and faith communities, it becomes obvious that when even .1% of the members these communities feel unsafe because of cultural values that tolerate exclusion or discrimination, this is .1% too many. Injustice to the vulnerable is a threat to justice for all, be they students or adherents, educators or religious leaders.